Saurav Sarmah
CEAS, SIS, JNU
ghimirey2000@gmail.com
Veda means knowledge. The word Veda is
related to the Sanskrit root ‘vid’ meaning ‘to know’. So, it encompasses the
entire corpus of knowledge, both phenomenal and numinous. Actually, knowledge
is established through three primary epistemological premises, viz., sense
perception, logical-mathematical inference and reliable testimony. However,
when a subject employs inductive methodology to acquire knowledge, it is
inhibited by four defects, viz., limited senses, illusory perception, mistaken
inference and cheating propensity. As a result, inductive methodology cannot
reliably establish any type of knowledge, let alone the ultimate conclusions on
reality. (For instance, throughout history, men have died and they continue to
die; but we can never conclude that man is mortal applying induction because
there may
be an unidentified man or a future man who will never die).
On the other
hand, Veda is ‘apauruseya’ meaning that it is not a composition of any agency,
whether human,
divine or demonic. Indeed it is co-eternal with God: His very cognitive and
contemplative function. Therefore, Veda is untouched by the four
defects. The unauthored Veda, also known as ‘sruti’, remains in the
mind of God and at the beginning of material creation, He gives this infallible
knowledge to the seers or ‘drsta’ in the form of ‘mantra’ or sound vibrations
because they are qualified by their sinless character. The entire cosmos along
with the laws of nature is designed according to this knowledge. Thereafter,
the ‘sruti’ (including both the exact sounds and their meanings) is received by
the worthy disciples of the seers through the aural medium and they in turn,
instruct the next generation of qualified disciples and so on. Thus, the Veda
has been preserved and transmitted through generations in its exact form.
The Veda holds
a unique status among all sources of knowledge that it is the authoritative
parameter for establishing the validity of any other source of knowledge, which
may be based on empiric, rational or prophetic evidence, because the Veda
contains the perfect cognition and contemplative logic of God. Hence, even God
respects its authority and His statements (like those in Bhagavad Gita) conform
to the Vedic conclusions. Only in special circumstances, when He wants to
delude the demons that He may criticize the Veda. (For instance, Lord Buddha
preached atheism to stop animal slaughter in the pretence of Vedic
injunctions).
Moreover, in the absence of Vedic
authority, there would only remain contending and evolving schools of thought,
with their separate gods, prophets, theologians, philosophers, etc. As a
result, it would be impossible to create a universal standard of morality and
the society would gradually degenerate to moral relativism, which means, each
person would abide by his own whims and societal consensus, although uncertain
and unreliable, would assume the guise of authority.
Due to the existence of the stated
properties, the Vedic injunctions have to be accepted as self-evident or
axiomatic standard of reality. However, one need not accept the Vedic authority
on blind faith. It is not a revelation to a single person or a group of persons
at a particular point in history and at a particular geographical location. It
is an eternal tradition of plurality, which is based, not only on philosophical
disputation but also progressive levels of self-realization. We can accept the
Veda only if the stated results of its injunctions, according to the merit of
place, time and object, are attained. Throughout the Vedic history, we have
many instances of personalities who have lived according to the Vedic standard
and achieved proper results, including the most conclusive realization of
direct audience with God. Thus, the validity of Veda is established.


